Rufus_FrequentFlyers wrote:With regards to a timeframe I'd be in favour of waiting for Kolendo (if he's keen to do it) as it was him that kicked the whole thing off. Apart from anything else it gives those of us who are bit slower at writing tracks (or are busy) more of a chance to get something ready.
Of course a long deadline (4-6 weeks say) would be cool too.
alsoBackTheTooFuture wrote:You rang?
Glad u typed your reply Mr Lojt! Sorry to hear most of the stuff on the forum dont really intrgues udtbrock666 wrote:i don't normally get involved in the forum but when i do its cos something really intrigues me. i'd be up for getting on the compilation. i reckon it would be best not to vet it as such, as good tunes are subject to following and taste, plus people get bitter over them sort of things.
nonXero wrote:Definitely down for this but I think the voting should be as unbiased as possible (no favoritism or politics) and focus strictly on the music (I'm know, I'm an idealist.. ). Maybe the top 12 tracks with the most votes gets on the compilation? Also, I think money and legalities/copyrights should be removed from the equation. Artists should remain 100% in control of their tracks after the compilation is released. That's just my 2 cents
I think we passed the voting, and will proceed with 3 or 5 judges. Their personal taste would obviously shape the compilation, but i think that's still better than the "yo bruv vote for me cuz i wanna get released! yo." tingy. But if you think we should vote, let us know what's your reasoning
nonXero wrote:On another note, who would handle artwork?
nonXero wrote:Wasn't sure how song selection would be narrowed down so the voting bit was just an idea but I think having 3-5 judges decide would work too.
parsons19 wrote:Also, are we supposed to be starting tunes already!? Like has this started and the clock is ticking? cause I had better get a move on
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests