Original Face wrote: A word of caution, though. I think it’s telling that both the above examples take elements of garage and mash them together with elements from (mostly) more recent sounds (Grime, ‘wonky’, purple wow). The question to my mind is how much mileage there is in doing that. After all, Grime derived from garage in the first place, and the ‘purple’ sound is a form of dubstep, which is another of garage’s descendants. At some point we are bound to run out of compelling and novel combinations because the genres are so closely related. 'What then?' is what interests me.
ToneBox wrote:what is purple?
Dellity wrote:More than a year on, and unfortunatley (IMO), some of the points mentioned in this thread have come to fruition....
ljp wrote:Future = Tomorrow, and tomorrow never comes. Forever changing, forever living, forever expanding, or some hippie bollocks like that
slowpokecity wrote:it's just bass music you can skank out too, something we've needed to go back to for a long time.
but at the same time its composition on par with (imo) classical symphonies, if you sit down and listen to a well-produced FG track you can digest it properly and appreciate everything thats going on.
Original Face wrote:The question to my mind is how much mileage there is in doing that. After all, Grime derived from garage in the first place, and the ‘purple’ sound is a form of dubstep, which is another of garage’s descendants. At some point we are bound to run out of compelling and novel combinations because the genres are so closely related. 'What then?' is what interests me.

garethom wrote:Why does it need a USP, or all this worrying over what sounds like what, or how a scene has gone. Make what you want to make, listen to what you want to listen to, and who gives a fuck if it sounds like somebody else or isn't different enough from another genre as long as you're enjoying listening to it.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest